Effect of Nadishodhana Pranayama on Cognitive Function amongHealthy Individuals

Authors

  • K Anoop Assistant Professor, Department of Yoga, Sharada Yoga and Naturopathy Medical College, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. Author
  • Vrinda Badekar Professor, Department of Swasthavritta, Prasanna Ayurveda Medical College and Hospital, Belthangadi, Karnataka, India. Author
  • M Bhavana Assistant Professor, Department of Yoga, Sharada Yoga and Naturopathy Medical College, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/IRJAY.2024.70302

Keywords:

Cognitive functions, Nadishodhana pranayama, Pranayama, Yoga

Abstract

 

Background & Objectives: The Nadishodhana pranayama, alternate nostril breathing, activates and harmonizes ida and pingala nadis. This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of commonly practiced Nadishodhana pranayama on cognitive functions in healthy individuals.Methods:  A randomized control trial of 60 Subjects of age group fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited and randomly assigned to Group 1, study group (n=30) and Group 2 control group (n=30). Nadishodhana pranayama training was given for 15 min per session, 6 days per week for the duration of 8 weeks. Pre and Post parameters were recorded. Assessments were done using Cognitive parameters letter cancellation test, trail-making tests A and B (TMT), forward and backward digit spans.Results: The study assessed the effect of NSP on executive functions. The data was tested for normality using the Shapiro-wilks test. Within group comparisons and between groups comparisons were made using paired t test and independent sample test consecutively. Within group comparisons for study group showed a significant improvement in Single Letter Cancellation Test (p=0.0028) and digit span forward (p<0.0005). Interestingly there was a significant reduction in digit span backward (p=0.005) in the control group. Between group comparisons showed a significant improvement in the digit span forward test following the intervention (p=0.003). The results suggest that Nadishodhana pranayama are beneficial for cognitive functions.Interpretation & Conclusion: Nadishodhana pranayama practice is beneficial for improving cognitive functions, Hence Nadishodhana pranayama can be prescribed as effective modality to improve attention and manipulation in auditory working memory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Vivekananda Kendra. Yoga-the Science of Holistic Living. Chennai: Vivekananda Kendra Prakashana Trust; 2005. p. 1-2.

Garfinkel M, Schumacher HR Jr. Yoga. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2000;26:125-32.

Nagendra HR. Yoga Its Basis and Application. Bangalore: Swami Vivekananda Yoga Prakashan; 2005.

Dutta RS. Yogic Exercises-Physiologic and Psychic Process. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 1998.

Swami Satyananda Saraswati. Asana Pranayama Mudra Bandha. 3rded. Bihar: Yoga Publications Trust; 2004. p. 1.

Raghvendra Sharma Raghav. Shiv Samhita, Second Patala, Verse-17. Reprint edition. New Delhi: Chaukhamba; 2011. p. 21.

Patrikar V. Swasthavritta Vidnyan. 1st ed. Vol. 2. Nagpur: Godavari Publisher; 2005. p. 99-101.

Agrawal SK. Nadi Shodhana. 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Orientalia; 2007. p. 37.

Gaud S. Svasthavrittam. 5thed. Rohtak: Naath Pustak Bhandar. p. 328.

Veerabhadrappa SG, Baljoshi VS, Khanapure S, Herur A, Patil S, Ankad RB, et al. Effect of yogic bellows on cardiovascular autonomic reactivity. J Cardiovasc Dis Res 2011;2:223-7.

Muktibodhananda S. Hatha Yoga Pradipika. New Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications; 2012.

Ghiya S, Lee CM. Influence of alternate nostril breathing on heart rate variability in non-practitioners of yogic breathing. Int J Yoga 2012;5:66-9.

Stevenson A. Oxford Dictionary of English. 3rded. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 337.

Baron RA. Psychology. 5th ed. New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt Ltd.; 2011. p. 249.

Morgan CT, King RA, Weisz JR, Schopler J. Introduction to Psychology. 7th ed. New Delhi: McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited; 2015. p. 184-5.

Baron RA. Psychology. 5th ed. New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt Ltd.; 2011. p. 5.

Morgan CT, King RA, Weisz JR, Schopler J. Introduction to Psychology. 7th ed. New Delhi: McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited; 2015. p. 107.

Morgan CT, King RA, Weisz JR, Schopler J. Introduction to Psychology. 7th ed. New Delhi: McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited; 2015. p. 109.

Geyer J, Insel P, Farzin F, Sternberg D, Hardy JL, Scanlon M, et al. Evidence for age-associated cognitive decline from internet game scores. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2015;1:260-7.

Hardy JL, Nelson RA, Thomason ME, Sternberg DA, Katovich K, Farzin F, et al. Enhancing cognitive abilities with comprehensive training: A large, online, randomized, active-controlled trial. PLoS One 2015;10:e0134467.

Melby-Lervag M, Hulme C. Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Dev Psychol 2013;49:270-91.

Melby-Lervåg M, Redick TS, Hulme C. Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of “Far Transfer”: Evidence from a meta-analytic review.

Anoop, et al.: Nadishodhana Pranayama on Cognitive Function 2024; 7(3):7-13 11 Perspect Psychol Sci 2016;11:512-34.

Rocha KK, Ribeiro AM, Rocha KC, Sousa MB, Albuquerque FS, Ribeiro S, et al. Improvement in physiological and psychological parameters after 6 months of yoga practice. Conscious Cogn 2012;21:843-50.

Subramanya P, Telles S. Effect of two yoga-based relaxation techniques on memory scores and state anxiety. Biopsychosoc Med 2009;3:8.

Nangia D, Malhotra R. Yoga, cognition and mental health. J Indian Acad Appl Psychol 2012;38:262-9.

Telles S, Joseph C, Venkatesh S, Desiraju T. Alterations of auditory middle latency evoked potentials during yogic consciously regulated breathing and attentive state of mind. Int J Psychophysiol 1993;14:189-98.

Natu MV, Agarwal AK. Testing of stimulant effects of coffee on the psychomotor performance: An exercise in clinical pharmacology. Indian J Pharmacol 1997;29:11-4.

Corrigan JD, Hinkeldey MS. Relationships between parts A and B of the trail making test. J Clin Psychol 1987;43:402-9.

Gaudino EA, Geisler MW, Squires NK. Construct validity in the trail making test: What makes Part B harder? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1995;17:529-35.

Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological Assessment. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.

Reitan RM. Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills 1958;8:271-6.

Ostrosky-Solís F, Lozano A. Digit span: Effect of education and culture. Int J Psychol 2006;41:333-41.

Subramanian RK, Devaki PR, Saikumar P. Alternate nostril breathing at different rates and its influence on heart rate variability in non practitioners of yoga. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:CM01-2.

Bhavanani AB, Ramanathan M, Balaji R, Pushpa D. Differential effects of uninostril and alternate nostril pranayamas on cardiovascular parameters and reaction time. Int J Yoga 2014;7:60-5.

Pradhan B. Effect of kapalabhati on performance of six-letter cancellation and digit letter substitution task in adults. Int J Yoga 2013;6:128-30.

Telles S, Raghuraj P, Arankalle D, Naveen KV. Immediate effect of high-frequency yoga breathing on attention. Indian J Med Sci 2008;62:20-2.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-03

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): International Research Journal of Ayurveda And Yoga (March) 2024

Section

Original Research Article

How to Cite

Anoop, K., Badekar, V., & Bhavana, M. (2024). Effect of Nadishodhana Pranayama on Cognitive Function amongHealthy Individuals. International Research Journal of Ayurveda & Yoga, 7(3), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.48165/IRJAY.2024.70302
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC